阿波罗经济学家称表示

根据阿波罗全球管理首席经济学家(曾拥有TechCrunch的私募股权巨头)最近发表的说明

阿波罗的"托斯滕斯洛克"(Torsten Slok)关注他所称的"S&P 493"——"S&P 500"(S&P 500，减去字母，Amazon,Apple,Meta,Microsoft,Nvidia和特斯拉")——发现每个工人的利润率和收入看起来是平的，没有证据表明AI正在提高生产力。

Slok 称。 “尽管在人工智能周围进行了大量投资并到处乱搞，但该技术已经为美国公司在技术之外带来了零财政回报。

这是否仅仅是非技术公司落后于技术巨头的问题？斯洛克听起来很怀疑，认为美国公司“将越来越廉价的智能转化为更高的收入增长和更高的利润幅度”将很难。

“大赦国际可能是一个伟大的计算器，但在商业上，情报大多是判断，”他后来写道，“大赦国际不理解问责制、信任、文化、不成文规则、伦理取舍或公平，所有这些都决定了声誉风险，并最终推动收入增长和利润幅度。”

最近的研究还发现，大赦国际尚未取得显著的生产率提高。

本文由 AI宝库自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。

AI hasn’t benefited the bottom line of any big corporations outside the tech industry, according to a note recently published by the chief economist at Apollo Global Management (the private equity giant that used to own TechCrunch).

Apollo’s Torsten Slok focuses on what he calls the S&P 493 — the S&P 500, minus Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — finding that profit margins and revenue per worker appear to be flat, with no evidence that AI is improving productivity.

“Despite massive investments and widespread hype around artificial intelligence, the technology has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech,” Slok said.

Is this simply a matter of non-tech companies lagging behind the tech giants? Slok sounded skeptical, arguing that it will be tough for corporate America to “turn increasingly cheap intelligence into higher revenue growth and higher profit margins.”

“AI may be a great calculator, but in business, intelligence is mostly judgment,” he wrote, later adding, “AI does not understand accountability, trust, culture, unwritten rules, ethical trade-offs or fairness, all of which shape reputational risk and ultimately drive revenue growth and profit margins.”

Recent studies have also found that AI has yet to deliver significant productivity gains.

Auto-fetched and translated by AI Gem Box. All rights belong to the original author.