GPT-6.1 地面

2026年10月26日 - 链接博客

GPT-6.1 Terra(via) 发布公告中始终关注新模式的哪些方面得到强调。

就GPT-6.1 Terra而言，OpenAI采用视觉推理和计算机使用：

GPT-6.1 Terra是一个快速高效的模型，与GPT‐5.6 Terra相比，它迈出了一大步，它出色地完成了workday的通讯和计算机任务，从起草提案和解释技术图纸到填写表格和编辑录像。

Terra在Anthropic模型收藏中和Sonnet坐同位置-不是最便宜或最昂贵，使得更难决定何时使用。

计算机的使用是一个很好的例子，它从一个费用较低的模型中获益，因为你可能把它用于自动化的重复性任务。

OpenAI的"泰德·桑德斯"在对Hacker News的评论中提供了一些有益的建议：

就GPT-6.1 Terra而言，我想Terra可能比Astra和Sol在技术交流上要好，在视觉和计算机使用上类似(但速度要快得多！)，在大多数其他事情上更糟糕一些。对于API开发者来说，如果想要比Sol更便宜但比Luna更聪明的东西(特别是对于视觉/计算机使用/通信)，这是一个很好的中程选项。对于订户来说，这不是一个拆弹——如果你在达到使用限制，也许它能帮助你走得更远一点，如果你想更清晰的通信或者更快地使用计算机，那就能够是一个很好的选择。

以下是不同推理层次的肽。这个"max"的肽花去11.3161分，花了4分11秒：

以下是一个新的比较网格，显示OpenAI当前边缘分出线的每个推理级别：GPT-6 Astra,GPT-6.1 Sol,GPT-6.1 Terra，和GPT-6 Luna.

GPT-6.1 Terra的价格是每百万个输入令牌和每百万个产出——几乎是GPT-5.6 Terra和GPT-6.1 Sol的一半价格，大约是GPT-6 Luna的价格为10x.

最近的文章

- Battle Drones - 一种带有音频多人游戏机的被编码为RTS的氛围 - 2026年10月20日

- 你好 Python 3.15 再见3.10 现在我可以用到3.11 - 2026年10月12日

- 我博客的新内容，用我的声音打造 - 2026年10月9日

- Claude 海库 5.5 - 2026年10月7日

本文由 AI宝库自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。

26th October 2026 - Link Blog

GPT-6.1 Terra (via) It's always interesting to note which aspects of a new model are emphasized in the release announcement.

In the case of GPT-6.1 Terra, OpenAI went with visual reasoning and computer use:

We’re introducing GPT-6.1 Terra, a fast, efficient model that combines detailed visual reasoning and precise computer use alongside clearer, more natural writing. A significant step up from GPT‑5.6 Terra, it excels at the communication and computer-based tasks that fill the workday, from drafting proposals and interpreting technical drawings to filling out forms and editing videos.

Terra sits in the same position as Sonnet in the Anthropic model collection - not the cheapest or the most expensive, making it harder to decide when to use it.

Computer use is a good example of a task that benefits from a less expensive model, since you might put it to work on automated, repetitive tasks.

OpenAI's Ted Sanders provided some useful advice in a comment on Hacker News:

In the case of GPT-6.1 Terra, I'd say Terra is probably better than Astra and Sol at technical communication, similar on vision and computer use (but much faster!), and a bit worse on most other things. For API developers, it's a nice midrange option if you want something cheaper than Sol but a lot smarter than Luna (especially for vision / computer use / communication). For subscribers, it's not a bombshell release - if you're hitting usage limits, maybe it helps you go a bit further, and if you want clearer communication or faster computer use, it can be a nice option to select.

Here are the pelicans for the different reasoning levels. This pelican for "max" cost 11.3161 cents and took 4 minutes and 11 seconds:

Here's a new comparison grid showing pelicans for every reasoning level of OpenAI's current frontier lineup: GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6.1 Terra, and GPT-6 Luna.

GPT-6.1 Terra is priced at $1/million input tokens and $5/million output - almost half the price of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol, and around 10x the price of GPT-6 Luna.

相关 AI 工具

相关免费羊毛

同源资讯