据Business Insider报道，人工智能公司Anthropic提交了一份335页的IPO招股书。为了了解这份文件是否由AI撰写，Business Insider将全文送入AI写作检测工具Pangram进行分析。
Pangram的检测结果显示，这份约25.9万词的文件有92%被判定为人类撰写，部分句子和段落则被以“高”置信度标记为含有AI使用痕迹。
不过，这一结果只是检测工具的判断，并不能证明具体哪些内容由人类或AI撰写，也无法确认Anthropic是否使用了自家AI助手Claude。
Business Insider记者最初尝试自行检测整份文件，但由于文件过大遇到困难。随后，Pangram联合创始人兼首席执行官马克斯·斯佩罗（Max Spero）帮助其完成了全文检测。
斯佩罗表示，他对这一结果的解读是，文件可能在句子层面经过了轻度AI编辑或使用了AI，但似乎没有大段内容完全由AI生成。
被Pangram标记为可能使用AI的句子包括一段有关行业发展的描述，大意是AI发展速度极快，新版本模型迭代的间隔往往以月而非年计算。
Business Insider也指出，AI写作检测工具并非百分之百准确。人们使用AI进行编辑、校对或修改措辞的方式，都可能影响检测结果。
此前，Business Insider一名记者曾将自己的领英帖子和已发表文章输入Pangram。工具将其中一句话标记为AI撰写。她回顾写作过程后发现，自己原本写了这句话，后来接受了ChatGPT提出的改写建议。
Anthropic没有回应Business Insider就检测结果提出的置评请求。该媒体表示，Anthropic自己的AI水印系统尚未向普通用户开放，因此没有用于此次检测。
Business Insider作者凯蒂·诺托普洛斯认为，这一结果引出了一个有趣的问题。作为一家AI公司，Anthropic为何没有更多地使用自家产品来撰写招股书？但她也指出，招股书需要接受美国证券交易委员会的审查，文件中的每句话都可能受到关注，由人类参与撰写也有其合理性。
本文由 AI宝库自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。
According to Business Insider, the artificial intelligence company Anthropic submitted a 335-page IPO book. In order to understand whether the document was written by AI, Business Insider sent the full text to the AI Writing Test Tool Pangram for analysis.
Pangram's test results show that 92 per cent of the approximately 259,000 words in this document were classified as human writing, while some sentences and paragraphs were marked with “high” confidence as containing AI usage traces.
However, this result is a test tool's judgement and does not prove which specific elements were written by humans or AI, nor does it confirm whether Anthropic used his own AI assistant, Claude.
The journalist Business Insider initially tried to test the entire document himself, but experienced difficulties due to the size of the document. Subsequently, Max Spero, co-founder and chief executive officer of Pangram, helped him complete the full-text test.
According to Sperro, his interpretation of the result was that the document might have been slightly edited or used by AI at the level of the sentence, but there did not appear to be any large paragraph entirely generated by AI.
The sentence marked by Pangram as possible use of AI includes a description of industry development to the effect that AI is developing at an extremely rapid pace and that the interval between the different phases of the new version of the model is often measured in months rather than years.
Business Insider also noted that the AI writing testing tool was not 100 per cent accurate. The way in which people edit, proofread or modify their language using AI may affect the results.
A journalist from Business Insider had previously entered his post and published articles into Pangram. The tool labels one sentence as AI writing. After reviewing the writing process, she found that she had originally written the sentence and had subsequently accepted ChatGPT ' s proposal for rewriting.
Anthropic did not respond to a request from Business Insider for an evaluation of the results. According to the media, Anthropic ' s own AI watermarking system is not yet accessible to ordinary users and is therefore not used for this test.
According to Katie Notopoulos, author of Business Insider, this result raises an interesting question. Why, as an AI company, did Anthropic not make more use of its own products to write equity book? She also pointed out, however, that the equity book was subject to review by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and that every sentence in the document might be of interest and justified by human participation.
Auto-fetched and translated by AI Gem Box. All rights belong to the original author.